For software teams

Ranked decisions your
team can interrogate.

Paste your constraints, competing options, and unknowns. Get a decision framework with probability weights and traceable reasoning — not gut feel dressed up as consensus.

Decision output3 options · 6 factors

DECISION: Deployment strategy for the v3.2 API migration

A — Gradual canary rollout71%

Best rollback window; traffic pattern is predictable

B — Feature-flag cutover22%

Lower operational burden; flag debt accumulates

C — Big-bang cutover7%

Fastest execution; rollback cost is prohibitive

Top factor: rollback complexity under live traffic
Key uncertainty: peak load timing during window

How it works

Three steps from messy context to clear decision.

01

Paste your context

Constraints, goals, options on the table, unknowns you're carrying. No template, no special format — just the actual situation your team is in.

02

Get a ranked framework

Each option gets a probability weight derived from your inputs. Every weight has explicit reasoning attached — not a black box, not a vibes score.

03

Interrogate and ship

Share the framework with your team. Challenge any weight. Update the inputs, watch the ranking shift. Make the call with the reasoning on record.

Who it's for

Built for decisions with real stakes and no obvious answer.

Engineering leads

Choosing between architecture paths, weighing rewrites against incremental refactors, deciding when to incur tech debt and when to pay it down.

Product managers

Prioritizing between competing roadmap items when resources are constrained, timelines are fixed, and every stakeholder has a different read.

Founding teams

Evaluating pivots, pricing models, and go-to-market bets where the stakes are high, the context is messy, and gut feel has already been tried.

Get early access.

We're building in public and shipping to waitlist teams first. No spam — just a heads-up when you're in.